Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Dec 2010 19:19 UTC
Windows The rumours about Windows possibly being ported to ARM has left a lot of people bewildered; why would you port Windows NT when Windows CE 6.0 is a perfectly capable operating system? Putting all the pieces together, it's actually quite clear why you would want Windows NT on ARM: servers.
Permalink for comment 454660
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Bill Shooter of Bul
Member since:

Can't say I agree. X86 is not lacking for engineering designs. Even if it were, would that be more work than redoing all of the software you mentioned in an ARM compatible manner? I seriously doubt that.

Plus, remember, your target audience is a Small or Home Office. Power, space, heat: these are not that important in this environment. The power savings would be minimal for a single device.

I mean, look at this for heaven sakes:

35 watts. That's a compact florescent bulb.

Now, I understand the Ipad (a powerful Arm device) can pull as little as 2.5 watts. A significant difference when running a large number of devices.

At an average price of 12 cents per kilowatt hour here in the US, that amounts to yearly costs of

MSI Wind : $35

iPad : $5.00

So they'll be saving every company $30 on average by porting everything over to ARM, assuming that they are both capable of handling the required work load.

Reply Parent Score: 2