Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Dec 2010 19:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 454660
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-14
Can't say I agree. X86 is not lacking for engineering designs. Even if it were, would that be more work than redoing all of the software you mentioned in an ARM compatible manner? I seriously doubt that.
Plus, remember, your target audience is a Small or Home Office. Power, space, heat: these are not that important in this environment. The power savings would be minimal for a single device.
I mean, look at this for heaven sakes:
http://www.msi.com/index.php?func=prodtmpspec&maincat_no=729&cat2_n...
35 watts. That's a compact florescent bulb.
Now, I understand the Ipad (a powerful Arm device) can pull as little as 2.5 watts. A significant difference when running a large number of devices.
At an average price of 12 cents per kilowatt hour here in the US, that amounts to yearly costs of
MSI Wind : $35
iPad : $5.00
So they'll be saving every company $30 on average by porting everything over to ARM, assuming that they are both capable of handling the required work load.