Linked by robojerk on Thu 30th Dec 2010 00:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 455094
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I don't want to sound like a cynic but every time I hear about an iPod competitor I'm always let down because of three factors:
1) Its Windows only with MSC when it available is entirely useless when you have a large collection thus the indexing with each reboot taking ages.
2) Fails to support AAC audio -its an open standard for goodness sake!
3) The size and price is always, in every case, uncompetitive with the iPod; every time I see a competitor to the iPod they're the same price but with less space.
PS. Don't mention Archos because I'll throttle you one; if there was ever an example of a company who makes a product only to abandon it after a few moths they would be it. If there was ever a company who make it impossible to replace the hard disk (in the case of their tablet device) then they would be it. Archos is like Apple on steroids when it comes to providing products that they fail to support for the long term and lock down so it is next to impossible to use their device for anything other than they deem as 'acceptable'.