Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Jan 2011 00:07 UTC
Permalink for comment 455994
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-02-11
Well I'd say that overall the Palm brand is more renowned for its PDA than for its smartphones...
Back in the day they were the kings. They popularized the PDA and made it something useful and "common".
Later the Treo line of smartphones were very good but in my opinion much less recognized than their PDA. Especially after Blackberry came and basically took that market from them.
And finally the WebOS devices. Which didn't make the Palm name much bigger in spite of the wonderful OS they were running...
When I show my Palm Pré Plus running the wonderful WebOS, people either don't know Palm at all, or they say "Palm? They are making PDA, aren't they? Is it a PDA? I thought you were using a phone?!? <puzzled expression>"
So in my opinion, HP dumping the Palm brand may be a shame but surely not a bad move.
It is certainly best for WebOS to get a fresh start with the name of HP rather than under an old brand known for antiquities only.