Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Jan 2011 22:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 456154
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-18
1) This is also a necessary for 3rd parties to write good software for a platform that can run on multiple version of the same operating system on multiple platforms.
Which isn't really a problem if people download the closed source executables from a reputable source i.e. the distributor.
If you downloaded a shell script for Unix/Linux without understanding from a random site and not understanding how it worked and just ran it, it would cause havok on your system as well.
Ergo the problem is user education not the fact that it is closed source. Funnily enough as a educated user I have no problems with viruses and malware even though I use both open and closed source applications.
But you will continue to push your anti-window/anti closed source agenda at every opportunity.
Edited 2011-01-06 10:24 UTC