Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 7th Jan 2011 18:00 UTC
Permalink for comment 456608
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-06-24
No, the price to volume sales inversely made is not a good deal for anyone but the middle man. The manufacture has more infrastructure to maintain (support, releases, so forth), the user has a diluted experience with the company and also lower quality of releases (fewer, more bugs, so forth), and the middle man (apple) gets to a high percentage of the cut along with demand due to being the outlet for a 'better' sales record.
The bottomline is apple is adding nothing to the software landscape, they are simply taking as much from the ground swell of idiots. Maybe the bozo consumer deserves to be raped by apple.