Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 7th Jan 2011 23:50 UTC
Permalink for comment 456792
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-30
Not so sure as a checksum is like a bit parity in the sense that it does not suffice to reconstitute the data that has been pari... (err, is there a word for that action?) or checksummed.
You do checksum from data. Using a different checksum algorithm requires the original data, not just the few bytes that form the old checksum. So yes, it may be a logistical nightmare for Sony.