Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Jan 2011 16:45 UTC
Permalink for comment 457113
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-05-13
Haha - yeah, I know what he/she meant ;-)
I think most companies, regardless of size or industry, or current market share within said industry, would jump at the opportunity to be in a "monopolistic position."
It just seemed a little disingenuous to even bother using the term "monopolistic tendencies" - you might as well say "two large companies who each independently would love to dominate the industry they compete in".