Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Thu 13th Jan 2011 17:13 UTC, submitted by Michael
Permalink for comment 457786
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-13
First, Mesa is heavily CPU limited when it comes to fast GPUs. The one tested is so slow that i don't think that became much of a factor. It's probably not realistic to expect this kind of performance from a high-end card, though.
Second, this is the r300g driver which supports r3xx-r5xx hardware. AMD dropped support for all those cards a while back, so it's not like they can combine it with their current drivers. And they won't for the more recent hardware, because A) still not as optimized as the r300g driver is, B) heavily CPU limited right now, C) doesn't yet support even GL3, D) won't ever support all of GL, at least by default, because of software patents, and E) they would lose all competitive advantage in the workstation market which is where they want to sell cards for linux anyway. They won't simply release their current drivers as open source either, because of all the IP in them that they don't even own.
All that said, this was a very encouraging sign. Hopefully the drivers will continue to improve.