Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Sat 15th Jan 2011 18:02 UTC
Permalink for comment 458319
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-05
"Well, maybe it's because EFL it's nearly abandoned if compared with QML and it will never be stable software?
I don't know what other developers think, but I had my bad time already working with non-supported libraries..."
We are releasing the EFL next week or in 2 weeks.
comparison with QML (on set top box) : QML couldn't just draw and scroll a list with 6 items (with no graphic options, that is, it was roughly just a list of strings). No problem with the EFL and a bunch of graphics effects.
So, QML is just way slower than the EFL.
The EFL are used in around 2 millions of set top boxes, they are supported by several companies. Not a lot, though, unfortunately.
They are quite stable and not at all abandoned. Thanks for the troll.