Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Fri 14th Jan 2011 14:58 UTC, submitted by Debjit
Permalink for comment 458343
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-08
Again that is plain nonsense.
Ada, Modula-2, Modula-3, Oberon, Alef have proven that you can have a more safe programming language and write OS with them. The amount of written assembly was no different if the OS were written in C.
Sadly from these list, only Ada survived and thanks to DOD.
Many programmers prefer to save typing than having their programs perform safely. Only if you never studied proper OS design can you be lead to believe that C is the only way.
There were OS being written in higher level languages before C came into existence, and surely there will
have other systems languages eventually replacing it.
I like C, but I really feel it is about time to get it replaced with a safer systems programming language.
That is why I really hope Microsoft gets successful with Singularity ideas. I am also watching how Go and D evolve over time.