Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Sat 15th Jan 2011 18:02 UTC
Permalink for comment 458524
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Even on planetkde some are puzzled with this port:
http://kamikazow.wordpress.com/2011/01/14/so-canonical-ported-unity...
Porting the shell is one thing, but it means that the shell will use a different library than all the applications given that Ubuntu has standardised on GTK: IMHO this is a useless increase in memory usage..
Even though I prefer Qt over GTK, I wonder why they did this port..
Apparently choosing a GUI library and *sticking to it* is really difficult: SUSE went from KDE to Gnome (and then back on some versions), Nokia switched from GTK to Qt, Canonical use both at the same time apparently, *sigh*.