Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Jan 2011 22:18 UTC, submitted by alinandrei
Permalink for comment 459088
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
It's a nice way of inserting a bit of sensationalism into the debate, but that's exactly what Shuttleworth is asking Qt application developers to do.
That's about the size of it, and probably what will happen.
It will get ignored by upstream, like many of the other things Ubuntu has done, because people are not going to rewrite their applications to support something that Ubuntu has suddenly come up with out of the blue.
Those of us actually debating something here are asking what it will take for what Mark Shuttleworth wants to be a success. Telling us that we can all ignore him is probably what will end up happening, but it's not terribly productive.
Well no. People have asked for better Qt aplication support for years, and got completely stonewalled by Ubuntu and then other people did the actual work.
It does a disservice to the people who've actually done work and written code on this front to claim that Ubuntu is now somehow starting this off.