Linked by sawboss on Sat 29th Jan 2011 00:15 UTC
Permalink for comment 460153
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-06
Its very pitiful performance wise. I strongly suspect its that way precisely because intel wants to sell their higher end processors and are afraid of making atom too good which would eat into their more lucrative sales. Frankly a down clocked core i3 vastly outperforms an atom with not much more power use. Neither of these parts are in the same league power wise as ARM though. I wish there were some benchmarks run comapring cortex a9 to atom. I suspect we'll need full linux running on one of these to get those numbers.