Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Feb 2011 00:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 461513
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-27
You think Qt slowed them down?
By far it did, and drayned a lot of money in the process.
it would estimate the time taken to make a Qt interface/application set (browser/mail/media player) of comparable quality to the current (gtk) n900 stack, to be around 3 months for a moderate sized team
You dream to much, and the reality says the contrary.
It would be faster, it would be portable and it would be feasible
"It would" differs from "It does", being multiplatform brings zero to the table, it just need to run well on Nokia phones.
The n900 was 5 years late
In the contrary, it was a phone ahead of its time, many many agree with me.