Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Feb 2011 00:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 461573
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-21
I keep seeing people going "they need to give up their own OS and go with one from outside". The choice is not simple.
* Getting an OS from outside (ie. WebOS) would be useless. They'd spend too much time, resources, money on getting proficient on that OS. Taking a ready-made product in dropping it in is never as simple as it seems to people outside the software industry.
* Outsourcing their OS to another company (ie. Android or WP7) means giving up control and remaining a mere OEM.
An in-house OS means independence and a complete hardware+software stack. That's why Apple will never share iOS with anybody else. That's why we see companies making their own OS.
Android is a reasonable choice for Nokia, given the cross compatibility of Qt and Dalvik between Android and MeeGo. But it would be a shame for all the money and R&D power they have to go the easy way out. It will work on the short term but be a mistake in the long run.
Much of Elop's criticism of the laid-back management of Nokia is entitled. But adopting WP7 or Android is not the answer. The answer is to shape up and start shipping MeeGo products, and to build up an ecosystem of apps and services based off it.