Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Feb 2011 11:35 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless A lot of people are wondering why Nokia didn't choose to go with Android. How can Nokia differentiate themselves when Android is a lot more open and free than Windows Phone 7? As usual, the key to this is in the details. If you read the announcements carefully, you'll see that Microsoft offered Nokia something Google most likely didn't. Update: What a surprise. Elop just confirmed Nokia has a special deal with Microsoft. Whereas HTC, Samsung, and so on are not allowed to customise WP7 - Nokia is, further confirming my theory.
Permalink for comment 461998
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Dead to me now
by sparkyERTW on Fri 11th Feb 2011 12:59 UTC
sparkyERTW
Member since:
2010-06-09

I fully realize that from a business standpoint, partnering with Microsoft makes sense. But I bought the N900 because it was open (mostly), because it showed respect to the customer by not having to have them jailbreak the phone to unlock it's potential, and because the development platform was the best by far (even if it was never fully taken advantage of). Windows Phone 7 obliterates all of this. The N900 will be the last Nokia phone I will ever purchase.

Reply Score: 1