Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Feb 2011 11:35 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless A lot of people are wondering why Nokia didn't choose to go with Android. How can Nokia differentiate themselves when Android is a lot more open and free than Windows Phone 7? As usual, the key to this is in the details. If you read the announcements carefully, you'll see that Microsoft offered Nokia something Google most likely didn't. Update: What a surprise. Elop just confirmed Nokia has a special deal with Microsoft. Whereas HTC, Samsung, and so on are not allowed to customise WP7 - Nokia is, further confirming my theory.
Permalink for comment 462675
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by ngnr
by aliquis on Wed 16th Feb 2011 03:47 UTC in reply to "Comment by ngnr"
Member since:

Hopefully they can still release some MeeGo devices and if people really want them then maybe they will make more.

But it would had nice if they put more focus on them..

Buf if you see this as a WP + MeeGo route vs exclusive MeeGo route then it looks quite good. You get an existing "eco-system" as he express it. An OS which really exist and works. And something you can release quite soon. Meanwhile you can keep on developing MeeGo until it works well. Release that to. And have both.

If they would supply the market then QT on both made sense. If the WP phones run Microsofts market then I guess it doesn't matter. Some WP tools for those and some Nokia/QT tools for MeeGo.

Reply Parent Score: 2