Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 17th Feb 2011 20:33 UTC, submitted by Radio
Permalink for comment 463111
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-24
There's a perfectly valid 3rd solution : let the marketplace distribute apps without DRM if the author wants to. That fixes the GPLv3 requirement for "disclosure of keys and methods". As for the other GPL requirements (source code, etc), they can be provided by the app itself.
But they're either too lazy to do the work, or too happy to hurt FOSS, or too intent on a fully-DRMed world in general.