Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 23rd Feb 2011 23:56 UTC, submitted by gogothebee
Permalink for comment 463802
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-08
Probably some sort of competition... "The world's most crappy smartphone update system".
As long as app compaibility is kept at this level, there's no reason to replace a firmware that works with something that may work, but could be an absolute disaster (cf iPhone 3G iOS 4 update and now this), just for the sake of aesthetics.
Anyway, who needs any other thing than security updates ? Look at all those people still using Windows XP without major problems in the desktop world, that's the way it should be done
New phones should use the latest version, to ensure that gradually it becomes widespread, but that's it.
Now if it's vendors and developers who want that users keep their phones up to date, in order to be able to use the latest releases' functionality in their applications, that's another story. In that case, they must do with their impatience by making a new release which works on all devices and installs flawlessly. Preferably simply by downloading and running a file on the phone : no silly desktop application, no need to depend on the carrier's nonexistent good will. Afaik, that's not quite the way it workd ATM.
Edited 2011-02-24 07:27 UTC