Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 27th Feb 2011 20:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 464211
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-12-04
Dropping support for 32-bit chips was inevitable at some point. I never understood why Apple shipped one generation of 32-bit only chips, when it would clearly require yet another transition only a few years down the road to 64-bit.
Trim support will be great, although it's a shame Apple took so long to implement this one. It's in Win7, and dramatically improves the useability of SSDs.
Personally, I still have some PPC code, and losing Rosetta's going to be a big PITA.
Previous versions in Vista+ is a little different. Those are snapshots generated periodically (IIRC daily in Vista, weekly in Win7.) In Vista+ snapshots are taken on all editions, but the interface to access previous versions requires Business/Pro/Ultimate. What Apple are referring to is backup copies that are generated in response to activity, not a fixed schedule, which is probably more useful.