Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Tue 1st Mar 2011 18:32 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu "The conflict between Banshee and Canonical over what should be done with Banshee's Amazon Store revenue stream, while it was finally resolved, was not Ubuntu's most shining moment. At the matter's conclusion, Banshee developers were not happy with the results. This is not how open-source communities should work together and no one knows that better than Mark Shuttleworth, Canonical, Ubuntu's parent company, who wrote, "We made some mistakes in our handling of the discussion around revenue share with the Banshee team.""
Permalink for comment 464573
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Bill Shooter of Bul
Member since:
2006-07-14

You are defining it in one of two ways which I can't tell form your post.

Definition #1 : A commercial Linux desktop is one that can be paid for.

So to become a commercial Linux desktop just like Ubuntu, Someone just needs to sell fedora?

Or

Definition #2: A commercial Linux desktop is one that has had an "extra level of testing".

So if Fedora is not a commercial Linux desktop ( because the lack of testing), then it has more bugs than Ubuntu? That could be quantitatively measured. I don't think you would find a statistically significant difference.

I still maintain that its a silly, ill defined statement that he made to try and earn good will in listeners.

Reply Parent Score: 2