Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Mar 2011 19:31 UTC, submitted by Debjit
Permalink for comment 465109
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-10-29
I’m pretty sure that the commenter to whom you’re replying doesn’t need title bars.
I’m pretty sure that the comment to which you’re responding isn’t suggesting that other people don’t title bars simply because this one person doesn’t need them. Moreover, I’m pretty sure that the commenter wasn’t even trying to imply that either. Rather, that commenter was responding to the inquiry “On what planet does this make sense?”, and I’m sure that the take away message from his comment is “mine”.
Moreover, I think that the principle that you’re invoking, while a good one, has been applied to the wrong ancestor in this threat. I’m pretty sure that the parent commenter was implying that this made no sense to him and therefore shouldn’t make sense to anybody. If I’m right, then you’re principled condemnation was ironically misplaced. If I’m wrong, then you’re response was altogether unwarranted. However, thank you for reminding us to be sensible.