Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Mar 2011 23:21 UTC
Permalink for comment 465183
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-05-19
You do understand that software is currently equated to art. Even the most braindead software developer can't believe that software is art.
Software is goods(for most part), not art.
And being classified as goods, does not imply new regulations for the software developer.
So far, I have enough trust in EU council to say it's intentions are good. And stuff in EU is already priced at a higher level, because consumer rights are wider.
As far as EULAs go, they aren't exactly cancelled, but could not be applied retrospectively or implied by the vendor.
And no one is implying that software vendors will be liable for crashes. What it does is imply, if it says that software will work - then it's a violation of your right as a consumer if it does not. Regardless of EULA.
But then again, this is draft version and will be amended 100 times.