Linked by David Adams on Mon 7th Mar 2011 17:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 465447
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-10-08
The BSDL has often be criticized as a "rape me license" as it explicitely allows exactly what you did describe. It's a developer's choice which license he applies. For example, if it's okay for me to provide my work for free to others who then can make the big money with it - fine. If this is not my intention, there are other licenses to choose from.
So basically, BSDL is more free than GPL as it allows you to do things with the licensed material than the GPL would allow. If this is always a good permission... this is debatable, I agree. But I would let guilt out of scope. Guilt has no place in business, in marketing, or in crime. It's about profit, after all.