Linked by lemur2 on Wed 9th Mar 2011 00:18 UTC
Permalink for comment 465457
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
really? open and free are no dependent on each other. it very much derives which aspect are you showing as open and which as free.
i can make open software under commercial only license where everyone can contribute as long as they relicense modifications to me.
i can also make software free of charge, but not open source it.
neither makes the definition of free OSS.
open and free are two completely separate confinements. same as free and free can be different. there are various representations of those terms and they are called licenses
btw... h264 is closed i agree
Edited 2011-03-09 18:16 UTC