Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Mar 2011 19:30 UTC
Permalink for comment 465650
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-05
I don't see it like that (that they have to allow other vendors in to really succeed), it's their OS, their IP and crucially -I am surmising- will remain more profitable to HP powering only their hardware especially in the medium and medium-long term. Having WebOS instances of whichever kind available to all HP PCs too, should broaden the developer appeal more than sufficiently to breathe life into the platform yet keep the profits internal.
As you also say, you can't 'fight everybody' (!) , fair point and I agree but also, you have to ask do you want to? ..I think to be a sizeable fish in the mobile pool is probably HP's aim here, and pushing some artificial and unnecessary desire to dominate the other players and push far out in front of the competition would I believe only hurt their reality. Plus, the PC side together with the phone/tablet could really give them the big, broad, stable and enticing ecosystem that they want.
It's a bit like the huge fallacy of a white elephant in modern economics ....you don't actually have to have a consistently growing economy or company to have a perfectionly functional one. Well with listed companies and all the shareholders and dealers involved , sadly you do, but academically, you certainly don't.