Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Mar 2011 19:30 UTC
Permalink for comment 465766
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-10
Hmmm - granted, this is over a year old, but...
http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/11/17/reliability.study.has...
I agree with your point on ASUS - bought my mom a netbook over 2 years ago, still works like a champ, battery included...
My own 1201N bought exactly a year ago is flawless. I can't wait for their new tablet line.
As to HP - I only owned printers before, and they did go down the drain qualitywise in the past 5-6 years. I was just shopping for a low-end multifunction device, spent half a day researching my options. At the price point I was looking at ($2-300) I've read dozens of horror stories about the low built quality of HP MFs. Customer reviews (amazon, zdnet) along test sites pointed me to Canon and Brother machines. Finally, I went with the former, since no manufacturer offered full duplex (printing/photocopying on both sides) at this price point. Got the MF4320d (3 in 1, printer, scanner, copier) for about $250 and very happy with the results. Build quality seems very solid, it's fast, green (low energy use + saving paper thanks to duplex) and silent.