Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 17th Mar 2011 13:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 466637
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-12-25
Forgetting what the PS3 is and can do or can't do, or what GeoHot intentions were and the way Sony treats their loyal customers, is it really legal for them to have access to his bank accounts over this? Is he being accused of terrorism? How can you prove that he received donations for the use of hacking his PS3? If he even received donations at all, which is strictly between him and the donor. And, of course, his bank, who I thought had some kind of guarantee of privacy for it's customers. It sounds like if Sony had a case, they wouldn't need to go through such lengths. If you need to request access to something that has nothing to do with what you're trying to prove just to see if you have a chance at doing something here instead of there, you don't have a leg to stand on. This judge is an idiot!