Linked by Dedoimedo on Thu 17th Mar 2011 23:17 UTC
Debian and its clones Writing about Debian is not a simple thing. You know it's the giant that has spawned pretty much every other distro out there. It's almost like a Roman Empire, almost a taboo. Furthermore, it's not a desktop distro per se. It's more sort of a template you use to build your platform. It's also a SOHO server distro, therefore it more fits into the business category, comparable to CentOS and similar.
Permalink for comment 466665
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

The network adapter in a laptop is a backup in case a wireless signal is nowhere to be found

It can also be used when no wireless driver is to be found. Plugging a laptop into a router really isn't a big deal. I've had to do it with XP numerous times.

Neither does Slackware claim such support, but it's there.

Well you would have to make a comparison with multiple cards to make a convincing argument. But even if you concluded that Slackware has better wireless what? I don't know why the hell anyone would go with Debian if hardware support is a priority. As with FreeBSD I would assume that it would need some extra tweaking for wireless, hence installing with ether.

Why is it so hard to admit that Debian Squeeze has some bugs to be fixed? My god, it's a mainstay of Linux and all other F/OSS software that there will always be bugs to be squished, and functionality to improve upon, and so on. Don't get so butthurt because you think someone is picking on your baby OS.

My baby OS? LOL I don't use Linux on the desktop and on the server Debian would probably be the last distro I would use. But I don't see them trying to bullshit anyone into believing they are some super awesome distro that will detect all your hardware. I thought it was common knowledge that it is the distro of choice for GPL loons and user friendliness is not a priority. Maybe they should put a disclaimer on the website.

Reply Parent Score: 2