Linked by Dedoimedo on Thu 17th Mar 2011 23:17 UTC
Debian and its clones Writing about Debian is not a simple thing. You know it's the giant that has spawned pretty much every other distro out there. It's almost like a Roman Empire, almost a taboo. Furthermore, it's not a desktop distro per se. It's more sort of a template you use to build your platform. It's also a SOHO server distro, therefore it more fits into the business category, comparable to CentOS and similar.
Permalink for comment 466800
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Debian Squeeze Wheezy/sid
by martyfelker on Fri 18th Mar 2011 18:28 UTC
Member since:

I haved been installing OS for for l15 years so the Debian test install manual mode was not difficult. Because I have a boot maanger in sda partition 1 Debian does not see see my first drive but not a problem it ses the partitoning on drive 2 (3 Linux partitions, extended with Windows image) this is not a plroblem for me. What I like about Debian is that it is truly rock solid and I've not had a problem installing sid plgrade whatsover. Picks up my rather old graphics care which is more than I can say about the latest openSUSE , Fedora and Ubuntu. Kernel on DVD 2.6.32 but installing 2.6.37 is no problem. Don't particularly like GRUB2 - in fact in some ways its more like LILO (rerung pdate-grub after every change). Installed VB and VMware WS 7.1.3 without a problem - as many of youj know WS needs a patch to run with 2.6.37 but that is available on user forums. KDE 4 works well - its at version 4.45 so hardly state of teh art - might be able to install 4.6 from source - but I like Gnome better anyway (except for openSUSE). YOu don't install Debian for state-of-the arts Desktops but GNOME 2.30 is good enough for me - I'll try GNOME 3/Gnome shell when it lhits the Debian rfepos.

All, in all if people want rapid installs and have good video cards go for Ubuntu. However once you've installed an OS - who cares??

Reply Score: 2