Linked by Dedoimedo on Thu 17th Mar 2011 23:17 UTC
Debian and its clones Writing about Debian is not a simple thing. You know it's the giant that has spawned pretty much every other distro out there. It's almost like a Roman Empire, almost a taboo. Furthermore, it's not a desktop distro per se. It's more sort of a template you use to build your platform. It's also a SOHO server distro, therefore it more fits into the business category, comparable to CentOS and similar.
Permalink for comment 466876
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Angry Rant Reviews present
by Lennie on Sat 19th Mar 2011 11:22 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Angry Rant Reviews present"
Member since:

Ubuntu seems to be more focused on setting up the desktop in such a way that everything is where a user probably expects it to be. And the software is and needs to be more up to date than on the server.

With Debian the desktop users are more of a second-class citizen I think or atleast should be familiar with Debian.

I do run Debian servers and everything is exactly where I would expect it to be. No surprises. A lot less updates other than security fixes and hardware support means very little work for admins. Because things which don't upgrade don't break.

So I think server users are the first-class citizens for Debian.

An example if your Apache is 36 months old you might not even notice. But if your Firefox is 36 months old you might be missing out on a lot of stuff.

It's kind of like RHEL isn't really targeted at the desktop either. :-)

Reply Parent Score: 2