Linked by David Adams on Fri 18th Mar 2011 16:40 UTC, submitted by Petur
Permalink for comment 466936
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-06-16
I understand the reason for compatibility, but if MS wants to continue to be relevant in the software business, they need to take a page from Apple and others, and leave some of those old children behind.
They need to cut the umbilical cord to all the old OS, browsers, etc. and build something new, from scratch, that will not work in the old software but it will be build with security in mind.
You people realized that it is backward compatibility the biggest problem hanging over the security of MS products.
It is time to do it and they should have started with Windows 8. I guess no one at MS has the vision or the balls to make that move. Ballmer has no vision. He might understand numbers but I believe he lacks the enthusiasm needed to run a company like MS.
You guys remember when the Apple board fired Jobs and got a guy from Pepsi co. to run the company and he ran it to the ground. It takes a special kind of person to run something like Apple, Microsoft, even Unbuntu. MS does not have that person on board right now and they better get one fast!