Linked by fran on Sun 20th Mar 2011 20:00 UTC
Permalink for comment 467027
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-25
So how good are the H.264 hardware encoders in comparison? I seem to recall the x264 guy saying his software had surpassed them a long time ago, as he did about most other H.264 software encoders. In general it seems hardware will be at a disadvantage in this situation. But sometimes you have no choice but to use the hardware encoding option (mobile devices vs. server based encoding)
VP8's software encoder seems to have done pretty well against the competition, though not quite as high quality or anywhere near as speedy as the very best (x264). That struck me as a pretty good performance, like a unknown competitor getting all the way to the final before being bested, like something out of a Rocky movie. Though most people have focused on the eventual defeat by the reigning champion. But how does it stack up in hardware?