Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 20th Mar 2011 20:20 UTC
Permalink for comment 467152
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
I've already started researching alternatives. Unfortunately all options mean losing the N900 as a phone, though I could keep it as a MID.
Anyway, so far it looks as though Virgin Mobile is a good option for me. They offer a plan that is $25/month for unlimited data and texts, and 300 minutes/month which is far more than I use (I'm a texter not a talker). That plan applies to their Android phones too, of which they have two. Both phones are decent; one is an LG Optimus V with no physical keyboard for $149 (probably about to be replaced as it is now out of stock) and a Samsung Intercept with keyboard for $199. That's quite reasonable for an Android phone from a major manufacturer without a contract. They also offer a BlackBerry but you have to pay $10/month extra for BIS, if you want to use the built in email and IM functions.
The only downside is that Virgin is just an arm of Sprint, which has spotty service in my area. I'm just outside of Atlanta, and while I'm in what is considered the "metro area", a lot of the places I go to regularly are on the extreme edge of Sprint's coverage map.
The only other option with good coverage for me is Verizon, but I'd go without a phone before subjecting myself to their particular flavor of customer rape. They are actually worse than AT&T.