Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st Mar 2011 22:52 UTC, submitted by ephracis
Permalink for comment 467302
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
It may be cheaper for Barnes&Noble to simply do as HTC did, when faced with similar outrageous claims from Microsoft.
Doesn't make it right, only means it is cheaper for Barnes&Noble.
Microsoft are almost betting on this, because then Microsoft can take the "high moral ground" in their FUD PR campaigns. This would be the whole reason for Microsoft doing things like this claiming of extremely weak patents. Sooner or later it will turn aoround and bite them.
http://271patent.blogspot.com/2007/10/oklahoma-jury-tags-patentee-1...
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=Pa3CK0ocxGgC&pg=RA1-SA5-PA31&lp...