Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 23rd Mar 2011 22:48 UTC
Permalink for comment 467724
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-14
You mean like motoblur, right? That was deeper than most skins, but caused them a world of hurt. It was crappy from the get go, disrupted the google experience, and made updates to the google experience take longer and work worse.
You don't differentiate to differentiate, you have to differentiate to be better. That's what they were *trying* to do with motoblur, but just failed. If you go too deep, then you break api compatibility. Then you need a new development platform, and all of the aps designed for android stop working. Even if they did, you'd need google's approval to get the google created apps ( marketplace, maps, navigation, gmail, ect) that help create the google experience.
That would have to be pretty awesome to throw away all of the benefits of a more stock Android.