Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 26th Mar 2011 02:00 UTC
smbd -V on your Snow Leopard installation, you'll see it's running SAMBA version 3.0.28a-apple. While I'm not sure how much difference the "-apple" makes, version 3.0.28a is old. Very old. In other words, it's riddled with bugs. Apple hasn't updated SAMBA in 3 years, and for Lion, they're dumping it altogether for something homegrown. The reason? SAMBA is now GPLv3.
Permalink for comment 467972
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-05-30
Not, it is a compliant version for SMB2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Message_Block#SMB2
It's Cocoa APIs for SMB2 to be current with Microsoft's standard. "
Confirmed by test cases written by Samba.
For the simple reason MS SMB2 documents don't match the real world implementation.
MS was forced to hand over there alteration documentation to Samba and IBM. For the simple reason SMB is not MS protocol. It is IBM's. This includes the SMB2 alterations.
MS also has to attend the compatibility test meeting of implementations of SMB protocols hosted by Samba.
So no matter what Apple will still have to do business with Samba. Might not be using Samba code but hey.
MS is not in charge of certificating if something is SMB 2 or not.