Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Apr 2011 21:57 UTC, submitted by JAlexoid
Permalink for comment 469804
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-14
Based on Andy Rubin's definition of open, I expect him to know that you need the source code to be ready before you can compile and distribute the object code. Honeycomb is already out in stores, so it doesn't make any sense to say that "Finally, we continue to be an open source platform and will continue releasing source code when it is ready,"
Might as well be honest and say "we want to give our partners a window of exclusivity and only after that we'll we release the latest version of Android as open source.". Until then, the latest version of Android isn't open source.
I love how he pretends he's being a victim of "FUD". Don't worry guys, Google is not evil!