Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Apr 2011 21:29 UTC
Legal Well. Raise your hands if you didn't see this one coming. Nobody is safe from Apple's and Microsoft's legal crusade against Android, not even Samsung, which supplies a lot of chips to Apple. Apple has sued Samsung for copying Cupertino's look and feel in various Samsung devices. This is about as surprising as the tides rolling in. Update: And Samsung's going to strike back. Hit 'm hard, Samsung. I don't like you anymore than any of these other patent trolls, but maybe we'll finally see it all crash and burn.
Permalink for comment 470606
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
galvanash
Member since:
2006-01-25

The point I think Thom was making is not who was first, the point is it simply shouldn't f*cking matter...

Look and feel patents are absolutely stupid and shouldn't exist. Actually, software patents in general are stupid and shouldn't exist - but look and feel patents FOR software is like stupid-squared...

Unless [favorite upstart company] is violating the trademarks of [favorite entrenched behemoth] it simply should matter legally speaking.

ps. Additionally, you should not be able to trademark generic images/icons and whatnot like most big software companies do. If it isn't directly related to company or product branding it should be off limits imo.

If you wholesale rip off a UI of a competitor and don't do anything to improve it - simply rip it off; well it's not like you can do it secretly or something. EVERYONE KNOWS. You either do it better, you do it significantly cheaper, or you fail.

Copy-catting the look and feel of something and competing only on price is in my opinion a perfectly acceptable business practice if you can make it work. It's not like it is an automatic recipe for success - you have to at least have a competitive product. If you can manage it I say good for you. I don't necessarily like the practice and it would certainly not be something I would look favorably on as a customer, but at the same time I don't think a UI paradigm is something you should be able to get a government approved monopoly over either.

Edited 2011-04-19 23:29 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4