Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Apr 2011 11:48 UTC, submitted by Elv13
Permalink for comment 471046
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Some of the patents (on both sides) might be legitimate and of merit. If I had a patent, which I 'invented', then a pool is by far the easiest way to leverage it.
Many individuals, who invested the time and money into the development of a unique patent might not have the money to fight the protracted legal case alone.
My (convoluted) point, is that not all patents are 'stupid patents on double clicking'. Some are based on hard work and innovation from an individual/company. Its just a shame that these discussions always focus on the frivolous.