Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Oct 2005 11:44 UTC
Linux Adobe, IBM, Intel, Hewlett-Packard, Novell, RealNetworks and Red Hat are all backing the new Linux standards effort led by the Free Standards Group. The nonprofit organisation plans to marshal their resources to form standards for key components of Linux desktop software, including libraries, application runtime and install time. The group said Monday that it will encourage software developers to use its guidelines when building programs for Linux as part of its Linux Standard Base project.
Permalink for comment 47114
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[20]: Qt in the LSB
by smitty on Tue 18th Oct 2005 19:06 UTC in reply to "RE[19]: Qt in the LSB"
smitty
Member since:
2005-10-13

If there is a LSB for GPL adn a LSB for LGPL then I don't see a future for it. I find LSB atractive cause the not strings attached.

You're misunderstanding. There would be 1 LSB which would have LGPL for everything, but some optional alternatives with other licenses. Why is this so useful? Because it allows the programmer a choice. If they don't want to use any GPL code, then they don't have to. But if they want to use libraries that have more features and don't care about the license, then they are allowed to do that as well. Your way forces people to care about the license even if they don't want to. Allowing both would let people who care about the license to use what they want, and everyone else could use what they want.

Reply Parent Score: 1