Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Apr 2011 20:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 471388
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-14
I'm not exactly up to date with the causes and effects of the AWS meltdown. Are you saying that some sites managed to continue working ... because they were running slackware?!? Or are you just saying that Slackware didn't cause anything to go down? Or maybe just that some slackware instances lost connectivity and managed to stay up?
It sounds like you're either saying slackware is magical, or that its more stable than windows 95.