Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Apr 2011 20:55 UTC
Linux Yeah, it's the day of double-dippin' today. And, the contradiction couldn't be bigger. In one corner we have one of the oldest and most respected distributions, and in the other corner we have the sometimes controversial but immensely popular relative newcomer. Slackware 13.37 and Ubuntu 11.04 have been released.
Permalink for comment 471412
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Wayland
by tuma324 on Fri 29th Apr 2011 21:31 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Wayland"
tuma324
Member since:
2010-04-09

"How is it non-usable? You can run a nested X11 session on top of Wayland and have all your applications working.


Sooooo, you can run a replacement windowing system ... with your normal X11 windowing system on top ... and that's suddenly better than just running X11 by itself? How is adding extra layers "removing bloat"?

Until there are Wayland apps, toolkits, frameworks, etc, there's really no reason to make it available in Ubuntu as the default. Which is what the OP is about.

Sure, those who want to play with it can install it themselves. Those who want to develop for it can install it themselves.

But it should not be an option on the main Ubuntu install CD until it's a viable alternative to X11, including native app support.
"

You have no f--king clue of what you are talking about, just like the other idiots in this site.

Wayland does use KMS by default and there is no need to make any configuration to start the compositor. This alone simplifies all the work that Ubuntu has to make in order to automate and secure the booting of the Xorg process so that users won't end with a f--king terminal when they install Ubuntu for first time.

Because to this date a xorg.conf is still needed. Yes, in f--king 2011. And those who say that no xorg.conf is needed they need to learn their system more and stop talking out of their asses.

Wayland will help to avoid cases like this:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=284356
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1594122
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1586131
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1292427
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=358906
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/13673
http://www.ubuntux.org/ubuntu-wont-boot
http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/newbie/92694-x-wont-start-ubuntu.h...
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21398281-X-wont-start-on-2-of-my-3...
http://askubuntu.com/questions/10078/x-wont-start-after-installing-...

Educate yourself before making lame comments like that.

Edited 2011-04-29 21:35 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1