Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Apr 2011 20:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 471424
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Requiring 3D isn't for the effects so much as it is for the rendering performance and smoothness it brings. The visual bling is just a side effect. It's not even an unreasonable expectation that machines have 3D cards these days, even cell phones are starting to get decent chipsets with good 3D capabilities.
The problem as we're all acutely aware is the drivers, which are getting better all the time but still aren't there yet for everyone.
I completely agree that inconsistency between "fallback" and normal workflows are ultimately a bad idea though. If anything it's a temporary band aid for the transitional period more than an actual solution.