Linked by fvillanustre on Sun 1st May 2011 21:51 UTC
Permalink for comment 471536
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Yes but we're talking about protecting users from themselves.
A noble idea, but software can't protect against user ignorance. Once you foolproofed a thingamajig, nature goes and invents a bigger fool.
Education would solve a lot of problems out there, but somehow the belligerent end-user won. Now techies are trying to find ways to let untrained individuals wield tremendous power without causing too much damage. Which is strange, because every other powertool comes with the expectation that anybody wielding it knows how to operate one.
A multipurpose computer simply isn't a toaster and treating it like one will, sooner or later, get you burned.
Not that it ultimately matters. Some belligerent end-user or a brainwashed techie will label me an elitist and the quest for uneducated toaster computing will hurry forward unabashed.
As a aside, maybe uneducated computing will become a reality with true A.I. Then again, the computer may opt to kill the dunce who is trying to give it commands :-)