Linked by fvillanustre on Fri 6th May 2011 22:19 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y When comparing the evolution in market share of Linux and OpenBSD, two operating systems that were born around the same time, a question comes to mind: why is there such a difference in market penetration? Linux, on one side of the spectrum, with a license that supposedly impairs commercial venues, has enticed companies and organizations to adopt and support it under varying commercial models, while the BSD derivatives (FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD), with a larger history and an allegedly more commercial friendly license haven't been as successful to gather a large installed base and widespread adoption.
Permalink for comment 472131
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No more opinion pieces please...
by evilsjg on Sat 7th May 2011 05:50 UTC
Member since:

The entirety of the linked article seems to be centered on the premise that Linux has a larger install base than the BSD's or some such myth. The BSD's are probably more commercially successful than Linux, especially in the high-end, NetApp, Juniper, IronPort, F5, Citrix and many more have distributed BSD-derived products widely and with great success, this fact just is not seen in the news, because of the BSD licenses corporate-friendly nature.

Reply Score: 5