Linked by fvillanustre on Fri 6th May 2011 22:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 472131
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-29
The entirety of the linked article seems to be centered on the premise that Linux has a larger install base than the BSD's or some such myth. The BSD's are probably more commercially successful than Linux, especially in the high-end, NetApp, Juniper, IronPort, F5, Citrix and many more have distributed BSD-derived products widely and with great success, this fact just is not seen in the news, because of the BSD licenses corporate-friendly nature.