Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 6th May 2011 22:13 UTC
Permalink for comment 472139
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-10
A small correction - Google did releases the (L)GPL parts of the Honeycomb stack. They delayed the release of the full AOSP build, but they are clearly in the green as far as (L)GPL compliance goes. IE they released the source to the Honeycomb kernel.
Apple, however, is in clear violation of the (L)GPL. Jobs is too busy convincing people they invented webkit: "Apple even creates open standards for the web. For example, Apple began with a small open source project and created WebKit, a complete open-source HTML5 rendering engine"
No, this is far worse than the Honeycomb case. They not only are in violation of the GPL, they also show great disrespect for the hard work of the KHTML team at KDE, forgetting that the first release of Safari was based on an almost verbatim copy of the entire source tree of KHTML.
Edited 2011-05-07 06:37 UTC