Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 6th May 2011 21:00 UTC
Permalink for comment 472186
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
Postgre is much more grown up than mysql. I frequently find myself pulling my hair out because of shortcomings of mysql and keep wishing I could use postgre in more hosted apps.
But mysql has become a defacto standard, and postgre isn't usually an option. It's very odd how the market chooses winners and losers, it rarely seems to be based on bringing the best product to market.
Sometimes postgre even rivals oracle in functionality. I don't expect an open source database to convert too many oracle clients, but it sure would be nice to phase out mysql.