Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th May 2011 08:19 UTC, submitted by porcel
Permalink for comment 472534
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I'm going to head out on a limb but I'd say that the main reason for the purchase is to buy up the customer base and then eventually merge Skype into Microsoft Live Messenger (maybe rebrand Live Messenger as Skype but use the underlying Live Messenger technology) over time so that eventually there is a single service.
What their services need is not only to be improved (which they are) but to rapidly acquire users as well which can be done through the acquisition. The result can be one of two scenarios - the first the end user start investigating Microsofts online services and sign up for them or the second scenario is nothing happens and Microsoft have found they've acquired another money losing company :/