Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th May 2011 08:19 UTC, submitted by porcel
Permalink for comment 472536
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-05-10
No, XMPP is decentralized: different parties can use different servers and communicate without any problem (http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/technology-overview/).
I agree with your other arguments.
End user needs simple, seamless and effortless solution.
Example: Google Talk tries to provide that using interoperable (XMPP/Jingle) technologies. Mobile video calls using Jingle (http://goo.gl/326Dd) are a good step, but there is still a lot to be done there.
I hope Microsoft/Skype takeover will motivate other open solutions to go in that direction too (XMPP/Jingle).
Edited 2011-05-10 12:32 UTC